Southfield Capital, LP v. Stonington Capital Advisors, LLC
- Analisa Torres
- 1:24-cv-06269
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Southfield Capital v. Stonington Capital, Judge Torres set briefing deadlines for confirming an arbitration award and retained the case.
Southfield Capital, LP must submit materials supporting its petition and may file a reply. Stonington Capital Advisors, LLC and Stonington Drive Securities LLC must respond or state that they do not oppose the petition.
What happened
Southfield Capital, LP asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Stonington Capital Advisors, LLC and Stonington Drive Securities LLC. The petition was filed on August 20, 2024.
The court ordered Southfield Capital to file supporting materials and a required statement by September 30, 2024. The respondents must file opposition papers or state that they do not oppose the petition by October 14, and Southfield may reply by October 21.
The court also decided to keep the case because an earlier related case, No. 20 Civ. 6053, was closed. Judge Analisa Torres did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award in this order.
The detailed version
- Southfield Capital, LP v. Stonington Capital Advisors, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-06269
- Analisa Torres
- Aug. 29, 2024
Background
Southfield Capital, LP filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was filed on August 20, 2024. The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, meaning the parties must present the evidence supporting their positions.
Briefing Schedule
The court ordered Southfield Capital to file and serve a statement required by Local Civil Rule 56.1, along with any additional supporting materials, by September 30, 2024. Stonington Capital Advisors, LLC and Stonington Drive Securities LLC must file opposition papers or a statement that they do not oppose the petition by October 14, 2024. Southfield Capital may file a reply by October 21, 2024.
Relatedness and Disposition
The court received Southfield Capital's statement of relatedness concerning an earlier case, No. 20 Civ. 6053. Under the applicable court rule, civil cases generally are not considered related unless both cases are pending before the court or the earlier case is on appeal. Because the earlier case was closed, the court retained this matter. The order set procedures and deadlines; it did not rule on the merits of the petition or confirm or reject the arbitration award.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.