Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 30, 2024

Clark v. The State of New York

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:22-cv-06635
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Clark v. New York: Judge Karas dismissed Clark’s federal petition challenging his continued supervision and treatment.

Who this affects

Eric Wade Clark’s federal petition was dismissed; the order also denied a certificate of appealability and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

What happened

In Clark v. The State of New York, Eric Wade Clark challenged his continued placement under strict and intensive supervision and treatment after earlier civil confinement as a dangerous sex offender. He also challenged related state-court decisions and an earlier federal case concerning parole revocation.

A magistrate judge recommended denying Clark’s petition. Clark did not file objections, and the court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The opinion does not include the recommendation’s detailed reasoning.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas found no error and adopted the recommendation in full. He dismissed the petition, declined to issue a certificate allowing an appeal, and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Clark v. The State of New York · No. 7:22-cv-06635
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Aug. 30, 2024

Background

In 2016, a New York state court found Eric Wade Clark to be a dangerous sex offender with a mental abnormality and ordered civil confinement. In 2019, another state court ordered his release from confinement to strict and intensive supervision and treatment under New York Mental Hygiene Law § 10.11. Clark later sought discharge from that supervision. After ordering an updated report, the state court denied his discharge petition on October 14, 2021.

Federal petition

Clark, representing himself, filed this federal petition in 2022. The court understood the petition to challenge his continued supervision and treatment, the June 15, 2021 state-court order, the October 14, 2021 denial of discharge, an earlier federal petition concerning the 2007 revocation of his parole, and the state proceedings beginning in 2012.

Recommendation and review

The court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause, who issued a Report and Recommendation on August 5, 2024, recommending that the petition be denied. Clark filed no objections. Judge Karas therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the recommendation. The opinion states that the court found no substantive error, but it does not provide the recommendation’s detailed analysis.

Ruling

Judge Kenneth M. Karas adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and ordered that the petition be dismissed. The court also ruled that no certificate of appealability would issue because Clark had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied. It further certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The court directed the clerk to terminate the pending motions, close the case, and mail Clark a copy of the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.