T.F. v. New York City Department of Education
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:24-cv-01456
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Judge Abrams discontinued T.F. v. New York City Department of Education after a reported settlement in principle, without costs and with 30 days to seek restoration.
T.F., C.F., and the New York City Department of Education are affected by the closure of the action. The parties had 30 days to seek restoration, and any request for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement had to meet the order’s public-record and approval requirements within that period.
What happened
T.F., individually and on behalf of his minor child, C.F., sued the New York City Department of Education. The court was told that the case had been settled in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 30 days. The court also said any settlement-enforcement request would require the agreement to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within that period.
Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The order did not decide the underlying dispute, and it allowed a later request to restore the case within 30 days.
The detailed version
- T.F. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:24-cv-01456
- Ronnie Abrams
- Aug. 29, 2024
Background
T.F., individually and on behalf of his minor child, C.F., brought this action against the New York City Department of Education. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the terms of the parties’ reported settlement.
Court’s Action
The Court stated that it had been reported that the case was settled in principle. It ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. The Court warned that an application filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.
The Court further stated that, if the parties wanted the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the Court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Result and Scope
The order ended the case’s active status based on the reported settlement in principle; it did not resolve the underlying claims on their merits. The opinion does not state whether a final settlement agreement had been completed or disclose its terms.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.