Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 3, 2024

E.K. v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-11276
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In E.K. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Schofield granted the request to seal the IDEA administrative record.

Who this affects

The order protects the privacy of minor student J.A.K. and limits public access to the certified administrative record in the case.

What happened

E.K. v. New York City Department of Education concerns a case brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The parties jointly asked to file the certified administrative record under seal because it contains identifying, medical, disability, and educational information about minor student J.A.K.

The court granted the application. It concluded that J.A.K.’s privacy interests in keeping their education and medical history confidential outweighed the public’s interest in access to the record.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield applied the three-part inquiry for sealing documents and directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion at Docket 28. The order addressed sealing only and did not decide the underlying education dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
E.K. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:23-cv-11276
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Sept. 3, 2024

Background

The action arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The New York City Department of Education and the plaintiffs jointly requested permission to file the certified administrative record under seal. The record concerns minor student J.A.K. and contains the student’s name, date of birth, other identifying information, medical history, disabilities, educational records, and educational progress and history.

Request to Seal

The parties relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and privacy protections under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. They argued that the record should remain confidential because the underlying administrative proceeding was presumptively closed to the public and because disclosure would implicate J.A.K.’s privacy interests.

Ruling

The court stated that the three-part inquiry in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga governs requests to seal documents. The court found that J.A.K.’s privacy interests in keeping their education and medical history confidential outweighed the public’s interest in access. The application was GRANTED. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the motion at Docket 28.

This order concerns access to the administrative record. The opinion does not decide the underlying Individuals with Disabilities Education Act dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.