E.K. v. New York City Department of Education
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:23-cv-11276
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In E.K. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Schofield granted the request to seal the IDEA administrative record.
The order protects the privacy of minor student J.A.K. and limits public access to the certified administrative record in the case.
What happened
E.K. v. New York City Department of Education concerns a case brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The parties jointly asked to file the certified administrative record under seal because it contains identifying, medical, disability, and educational information about minor student J.A.K.
The court granted the application. It concluded that J.A.K.’s privacy interests in keeping their education and medical history confidential outweighed the public’s interest in access to the record.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield applied the three-part inquiry for sealing documents and directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion at Docket 28. The order addressed sealing only and did not decide the underlying education dispute.
The detailed version
- E.K. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:23-cv-11276
- Lorna Schofield
- Sept. 3, 2024
Background
The action arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The New York City Department of Education and the plaintiffs jointly requested permission to file the certified administrative record under seal. The record concerns minor student J.A.K. and contains the student’s name, date of birth, other identifying information, medical history, disabilities, educational records, and educational progress and history.
Request to Seal
The parties relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and privacy protections under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. They argued that the record should remain confidential because the underlying administrative proceeding was presumptively closed to the public and because disclosure would implicate J.A.K.’s privacy interests.
Ruling
The court stated that the three-part inquiry in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga governs requests to seal documents. The court found that J.A.K.’s privacy interests in keeping their education and medical history confidential outweighed the public’s interest in access. The application was GRANTED. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the motion at Docket 28.
This order concerns access to the administrative record. The opinion does not decide the underlying Individuals with Disabilities Education Act dispute.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.