Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 9, 2024

Vuksanovich v. Airbus Group HQ, Inc.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-03454
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Vuksanovich v. Airbus Group HQ, Inc., Judge Rearden granted the parties’ request to provisionally seal motion materials until October 18, 2024.

Who this affects

Kristi Vuksanovich and the Airbus defendants, whose motion materials may be filed under a provisional seal; and the public, whose access to those materials is temporarily limited.

What happened

In Vuksanovich v. Airbus Group HQ, Inc., the parties jointly asked to file materials supporting the defendants’ summary-judgment motion and evidence-related motions under a temporary seal.

They said the materials included Kristi Vuksanovich’s medical information and sensitive commercial information belonging to the Airbus defendants. The parties proposed exchanging redaction and sealing proposals and filing public versions by October 18, 2024.

Judge Rearden granted the application and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF No. 188. The order addressed only the temporary filing restrictions and did not decide the underlying summary-judgment or evidence motions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vuksanovich v. Airbus Group HQ, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-03454
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 9, 2024

Background

The parties jointly sought permission to file under a provisional seal their legal memoranda and exhibits supporting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the parties’ motions under Rules 702 through 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the evidence-screening standards described in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The request concerned a large evidentiary record that included Kristi Vuksanovich’s medical information and sensitive commercial information of the Airbus defendants. The parties said they would confer about which information should be redacted or sealed under Rule 9 of the court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases.

Requested schedule

The parties proposed that each side provide its proposals concerning its own information by September 20, 2024; provide proposals concerning the opposing side’s motions by October 11, 2024; and consolidate the proposals and file public versions of the memoranda and exhibits by October 18, 2024. They also agreed to file a letter motion by October 18 explaining why particular information should be redacted or sealed.

Ruling

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden granted the application to file the materials under a provisional seal until October 18, 2024. The order also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF No. 188. This order did not rule on the merits of the defendants’ summary-judgment motion or the parties’ evidence-related motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.