Grullon v. DY Heights LLC
- Robert Lehrburger
- 1:23-cv-10431
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Grullon v. DY Heights LLC, Judge Lehrburger approved the FLSA settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Willaim Grullon and DY Heights LLC et al.; the case was dismissed and closed under the approved settlement.
What happened
Grullon v. DY Heights LLC was an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement.
The court reviewed the agreement and the parties’ letter, considering the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, the bargaining process, attorney’s fees, and possible fraud or collusion. It noted that the agreement had no confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions and that the release was limited to the claims alleged.
Judge Lehrburger found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement.
The detailed version
- Grullon v. DY Heights LLC · No. 1:23-cv-10431
- Robert Lehrburger
- Sept. 27, 2024
Background
Willaim Grullon brought an action for damages against DY Heights LLC et al. under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York Labor Law. The parties submitted a joint request for approval of their fully executed settlement agreement.
Settlement Review
The court explained that a federal court must determine whether an agreement settling a Fair Labor Standards Act case is fair and reasonable and results from arm’s-length negotiation rather than employer overreaching. The court reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ letter. It considered, among other things, prior proceedings; the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the action; the possible range of recovery; whether the agreement resulted from arm’s-length bargaining; the amount of attorney’s fees; and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions or non-disparagement provisions, narrowly limited the release to the claims alleged, and provided for attorney’s fees within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range. The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.
Disposition
Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued the case in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.