Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 24, 2024

McKenzie v. Warren

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-06656
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureContractPro Se
In one sentence

In McKenzie v. Warren, Judge Swain transferred the education-contract case from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York.

Who this affects

Kellyann A. McKenzie, Chad Warren, and Stepping Stone Pre & Grade School; the case will proceed, if at all, in the Eastern District of New York rather than the Southern District of New York.

What happened

McKenzie v. Warren is a lawsuit by Kellyann A. McKenzie alleging that Chad Warren and Stepping Stone Pre & Grade School breached a contract to provide her daughter with a proper education. McKenzie filed the case without a lawyer and lives in Massachusetts; the school is in Queens County, New York.

The court concluded that the alleged events occurred in Queens County, where relevant witnesses and documents would likely be located. It therefore determined that the Eastern District of New York was a more convenient forum, while noting that Warren’s residence was not provided and that the complaint did not contain enough facts to determine whether the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act applied.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York. The Southern District of New York closed the case, did not issue a summons, and left any decision about proceeding without prepaying fees to the receiving court; it also denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McKenzie v. Warren · No. 1:24-cv-06656
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 24, 2024

Background

Kellyann A. McKenzie brought this action against Chad Warren and Stepping Stone Pre & Grade School. She alleged that the defendants breached a contract to provide her daughter with a “proper education.” McKenzie invoked federal-question jurisdiction and filed the action without a lawyer. The complaint stated that Stepping Stone is located in Queens County, New York, but did not state where Warren resides. A footnote added that the complaint did not provide enough facts to determine whether the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act applied.

Venue analysis

Venue rules generally allow a civil action to proceed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. Because Warren’s residence was unknown, the court could not determine whether venue was proper based on the defendants’ residence. The court found, however, that the alleged events occurred in Queens County, which is in the Eastern District of New York, so venue was proper there based on the location of the events.

The court also considered transfer for convenience and the interests of justice. It stated that the events occurred where Stepping Stone is located, and that relevant documents and witnesses could reasonably be expected to be there. Because McKenzie does not reside in the Southern District of New York, the court gave less weight to her choice of that forum. It determined that the Eastern District of New York appeared to be the more convenient forum.

Ruling and effect

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406. The Clerk was directed to carry out the transfer. The Southern District of New York closed the case in that court, and no summons was to issue from that court. The transferee court was left to decide whether McKenzie could proceed without prepaying fees. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide whether the defendants breached the alleged contract.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.