Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 15, 2024

Cooke v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:24-cv-00536
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cooke v. Consolidated Edison, Magistrate Judge Lehrburger rescheduled a telephone case-management conference for November 26, 2024.

Who this affects

The order affects Charmaine Cooke, who is proceeding without a lawyer, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., and counsel of record by setting the date and format of the case-management conference and directing compliance with the judge’s individual rules and practices.

What happened

Cooke v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. is a case brought by Charmaine Cooke against Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. The order does not describe the underlying dispute.

The court rescheduled the case-management conference for November 26, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. The conference will be held by telephone, and the court directed the parties to follow the magistrate judge’s rules and practices. The clerk was asked to mail the order to Cooke, who is representing herself.

Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger issued the order on October 15, 2024. The order is a scheduling and case-management directive; it does not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cooke v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00536
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Oct. 15, 2024

Background

The opinion is a case-management conference order in Charmaine Cooke’s case against Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. The text does not state the nature of Cooke’s claims or the underlying facts. The order identifies Cooke as proceeding without a lawyer.

Order

The court rescheduled the case-management conference for November 26, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties were instructed to review and follow Judge Lehrburger’s individual rules and practices. The court requested that the clerk mail a copy of the order to Cooke at the address listed in the order. Copies were also transmitted to counsel of record.

Disposition

The court entered a scheduling order. It did not rule on the merits of the case, dismiss any claim, or grant or deny a merits motion. Robert W. Lehrburger, United States Magistrate Judge, signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.