Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Oct. 17, 2024

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Baroco Contracting Corporation

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:24-cv-01898
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
7
ArbitrationContractErisaFee Petition
In one sentence

In Trustees v. Baroco, Judge Ho confirmed a $4,047,686.87 arbitration award, awarded fees and costs, and ordered post-judgment interest.

Who this affects

The petitioners obtained confirmation of the $4,047,686.87 arbitration award, $1,701 in attorneys’ fees and costs, and post-judgment interest. Baroco Contracting Corporation is subject to those monetary obligations.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Baroco Contracting Corporation, the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. The award arose after Baroco refused to allow an audit and allegedly failed to make required contributions under its collective bargaining agreement. Baroco did not appear in the court case or the arbitration.

The arbitrator ordered Baroco to pay $4,047,686.87, including the estimated unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the arbitrator’s fee. Because Baroco did not oppose the petition, the court treated it as an unopposed request for summary judgment and found more than enough support for the arbitrator’s decision. The court also found that the circumstances justified attorneys’ fees and costs.

Judge Dale E. Ho granted the petition and confirmed the arbitration award. The court additionally awarded $1,701 in attorneys’ fees and costs and post-judgment interest. The petitioners were directed to file a revised proposed judgment, and the Clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:24-cv-01898
Judge
Ho
Date
Oct. 17, 2024

Background

The petitioners were the Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund; the Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund; and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York. The opinion describes the petitioners as including employee-benefit funds governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a charitable fund, and a New York not-for-profit corporation associated with the New York City District Council of Carpenters.

Baroco Contracting Corporation was party to a collective bargaining agreement with the Union. The agreement required Baroco to make contributions to the petitioners for covered work and to provide books and payroll records for audits. After Baroco refused to submit to an audit, the petitioners conducted an estimated audit that found an alleged principal contribution deficiency of $3,068,149.25.

Arbitration Award and Confirmation

The petitioners initiated arbitration under the collective bargaining agreement. The arbitrator found that Baroco violated the agreement by failing to permit an audit and ordered Baroco to pay $4,047,686.87. That amount consisted of $3,068,149.25 in estimated principal deficiency, $383,007.77 in interest, $613,629.85 in liquidated damages, $402 in court costs, $1,500 in attorneys’ fees, and $1,000 for the arbitrator’s fee.

The petitioners sought judicial confirmation of the award. Baroco did not appear. The court therefore treated the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. Applying the Federal Arbitration Act’s highly deferential standard of review, the court explained that an award should be confirmed when there is at least a minimally reasonable basis for the arbitrator’s decision. The court found that the collective bargaining agreement required the contributions and audit access, and that Baroco had not contested either its failure to comply or the estimated audit. The court concluded that there was more than a minimally reasonable basis for the award.

The petition to confirm the arbitration award was GRANTED, and the $4,047,686.87 Arbitration Award was CONFIRMED.

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

The petitioners also requested attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the federal proceeding. The court explained that fees generally require statutory authority, but a court may award them under its equitable powers when a party refuses without justification to comply with an arbitration decision. The court found that Baroco had agreed to arbitrate disputes, failed to appear in arbitration, failed to comply with the award without explanation, and failed to appear in the federal proceeding.

The petitioners requested compensation for 5.4 hours of associate-attorney work at $310 per hour. The court found that $300 per hour was reasonable and that 5.4 hours was reasonable, resulting in $1,620 in attorneys’ fees. It also awarded the requested $81 in service fees and court costs. The total award for attorneys’ fees and costs was $1,701.00.

Post-Judgment Interest and Case Status

The court awarded the petitioners post-judgment interest on the full judgment amount beginning when judgment is entered, at the rate provided by federal law. The court directed the petitioners to file a revised proposed judgment within fourteen days after entry of the order and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 7-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.