Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Oct. 21, 2024

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. James S. Mitchell & Sons, Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:21-cv-09465
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Trustees v. James S. Mitchell & Sons: Judge Broderick granted the unopposed summary-judgment petition, confirmed the arbitration award, and ordered $4,204.50 plus records and interest.

Who this affects

The petitioners—trustees and labor-related entities identified in the caption—received confirmation of the arbitration award, $4,204.50 in specified amounts, post-judgment interest, and access to the respondent’s books and records for an audit. James S. Mitchell & Sons, Inc. was ordered to pay the awarded amounts and submit the records.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. James S. Mitchell & Sons, Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against James S. Mitchell & Sons, Inc. The respondent did not oppose the petition or appear in the case.

The court treated the petition as an unopposed request for summary judgment and reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant it. Because neither side objected, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Broderick adopted the recommendation, granted the petition, and confirmed the arbitration award. He awarded the petitioners $4,204.50, ordered payment of post-judgment interest, required the respondent to provide books and records for an audit, entered judgment, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:21-cv-09465
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Oct. 21, 2024

Background

The petitioners filed a petition under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 asking the court to confirm an arbitration award issued against James S. Mitchell & Sons, Inc. They also sought attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the confirmation proceeding. The petition was served on November 19, 2021, but the respondent did not oppose it, seek more time to respond, or appear in the action.

The petitioners asked the court to treat the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is a decision based on the court’s determination that no disputed issue requiring a trial prevents judgment. Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave granted that request and later recommended granting the petition.

Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation

The recommendation proposed confirming the arbitration award and entering judgment for the petitioners in the amount of $4,204.50. That amount consisted of the $2,900 award, $1,227.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $77 in costs. The recommendation also proposed ordering the respondent to provide its books and records from July 1, 2018, to the present so the petitioners could conduct an audit, and awarding post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

Neither party objected to the recommendation or requested additional time to object. Without a timely objection, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s findings or conclusions.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick found no clear error and adopted Magistrate Judge Cave’s recommendation in its entirety. The court granted the petition and confirmed the arbitration award. It awarded the petitioners $4,204.50, consisting of the $2,900 award, $1,227.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $77 in costs, along with post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

The court also ordered the respondent to submit its books and records from July 1, 2018, to the present for an audit. The Clerk’s Office was directed to enter judgment, terminate any open motions, and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.