Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 25, 2024

Huaxintong International Investment Management Limited v. Hongkun USA…

Full caption

Huaxintong International Investment Management Limited v. Hongkun USA Investment LLC

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:24-cv-08003
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Huaxintong v. Hongkun: Judge Cronan set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners and respondents in the arbitration-award confirmation proceeding, including the petitioners’ obligations to serve documents and file supporting materials and the respondents’ opportunity to oppose the petition.

What happened

In Huaxintong International Investment Management Limited v. Hongkun USA Investment LLC, the petitioners asked the Southern District of New York to confirm an arbitration award.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by November 21, 2024. The respondents’ opposition, if any, was due December 13, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due December 20.

Judge Cronan also required electronic and overnight-mail service of the petition, supporting papers, and the order, followed by an affidavit of service. The order did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Huaxintong International Investment Management Limited v. Hongkun USA… · No. 1:24-cv-08003
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Oct. 25, 2024

Background

On October 21, 2024, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The order states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court considers the parties’ supporting materials under a procedure used to decide whether a matter can be resolved without a trial.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials they intended to use to support the petition by November 21, 2024. Any opposition from the respondents was due December 13, 2024, and any reply from the petitioners was due December 20, 2024.

The petitioners also had to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondents electronically and by overnight mail no later than November 21, 2024. They had to file an affidavit confirming that service with the court no later than November 22, 2024.

Effect of the Order

Judge John P. Cronan set deadlines for serving documents and submitting briefing materials. The order did not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.