Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
- John Cronan
- 1:22-cv-07768
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Judge Cronan ordered briefing on whether the court could hear Rimini’s Sarbanes-Oxley claim.
Thomas Rimini and the defendants, whose positions on the court’s authority to hear the Sarbanes-Oxley claim were ordered for briefing.
What happened
Thomas Rimini sued J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and other defendants under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, seeking to move his Department of Labor case to federal court. The opinion states that he filed this lawsuit on September 9, 2022.
The court explained that federal review is available after 180 days without a final Department of Labor decision. If the Department issues a timely final decision, the law instead directs the plaintiff to seek review in a federal appeals court within 60 days. The administrative docket showed that Rimini’s complaint was dismissed with prejudice on September 8, 2022, before he filed this lawsuit.
Judge John P. Cronan did not decide whether the claim satisfies those requirements. He ordered both sides to file simultaneous letter briefs by September 20, 2024, addressing whether the court has jurisdiction and whether the exhaustion requirement applies to alleged retaliation occurring after September 2022.
The detailed version
- Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. · No. 1:22-cv-07768
- John Cronan
- Sept. 14, 2024
Background
Thomas Rimini filed this lawsuit on September 9, 2022. His complaint asserted a claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and sought to move Department of Labor administrative case 2022-SOX-00018 to the federal district court.
Jurisdictional framework
The court explained that Sarbanes-Oxley’s jurisdictional “kick-out” provision, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(1)(B), permits a plaintiff to bring a new action in federal district court after 180 days have passed without a final decision by the Secretary of Labor on the administrative complaint. If the Secretary issues a timely final decision within that period, the plaintiff’s recourse is to seek judicial review in the appropriate federal court of appeals within 60 days.
The public administrative docket showed that the case was docketed on March 18, 2022, and that a notice of docketing was filed on April 26, 2022. It also showed that Judge Calianos entered an order on September 8, 2022, dismissing Rimini’s complaint with prejudice and setting a deadline for removal to federal district court. Rimini filed this lawsuit the next day.
Court’s action
The court observed that Rimini appeared to have filed this action less than 180 days after filing his administrative complaint and only after a final decision had been entered. The court therefore ordered the parties to file simultaneous letter briefs by September 20, 2024, stating their positions on whether the Sarbanes-Oxley claim satisfies the provision’s jurisdictional requirements. The parties must also address whether the statute’s exhaustion requirement was satisfied for alleged retaliation occurring after September 2022, as pleaded in Rimini’s amended complaint.
The opinion orders briefing and does not decide whether the court has jurisdiction or whether the exhaustion requirement was satisfied.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.