Escoto v. Allerton Realty Group LLC
- Edgardo Ramos
- 1:22-cv-08722
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Escoto v. Allerton Realty Group, Judge Ramos approved the parties’ $135,000 Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law settlement.
Placido Escoto, Allerton Realty Group LLC, Kamran Abrishamian, and Ben Dash. The approved agreement provides Escoto $88,105.33 after $46,894.67 in attorneys’ fees and costs, and it ends the case.
What happened
Placido Escoto sued Allerton Realty Group LLC, Kamran Abrishamian, and Ben Dash, alleging that they failed to pay lawful minimum wages and overtime and failed to provide required wage and notice statements under federal and New York law.
The parties asked the court to approve a $135,000 settlement. Under the agreement, Escoto would receive $88,105.33 after $46,894.67 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The court found the settlement fair and reasonable because it resolved genuine disputes and litigation risks, and because the negotiations were conducted by experienced attorneys.
Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the motion for settlement approval, found the attorneys’ fees and other settlement provisions reasonable, directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions, and closed the case.
The detailed version
- Escoto v. Allerton Realty Group LLC · No. 1:22-cv-08722
- Edgardo Ramos
- Sept. 16, 2024
Background
Placido Escoto brought the action against Allerton Realty Group LLC, Kamran Abrishamian, and Ben Dash. He alleged violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and various provisions of the New York Labor Law (NYLL), including claims that the defendants failed to pay the lawful minimum wage and overtime compensation and failed to provide proper wage and notice statements.
The parties jointly moved for approval of their settlement agreement. The court explained that FLSA claims cannot be privately settled with prejudice without approval from the court or the Department of Labor. The court therefore evaluated whether the agreement was fair and reasonable.
Settlement Amount
The agreement provided for a total recovery of $135,000. Escoto’s counsel would receive $46,894.67 in attorneys’ fees and costs, leaving Escoto with $88,105.33. Escoto estimated that his maximum possible recovery was approximately $405,269.49, including wages and liquidated damages, interest, amounts based on his NYLL claims, and costs.
The court found the settlement amount fair and reasonable. It considered the disputed issues, including the defendants’ challenges to the number of hours Escoto worked and the wages he received, as well as the risks and delays of continued litigation. The court concluded that the agreement resolved genuine disputes through a reasonable compromise and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations involving experienced labor and employment attorneys.
Attorneys’ Fees and Other Terms
The court also found the requested attorneys’ fees and costs reasonable. The fee request was approximately one-third of the settlement. The court approved Fausto E. Zapata, Jr.’s $500 hourly rate and noted that the lodestar—the reasonable hourly rate multiplied by the reasonable hours worked—was $41,050. The requested attorneys’ fees, excluding costs, were $44,052.67, producing a lodestar multiplier of approximately 1.07. The court accepted that multiplier and approved the total $46,894.67 request for fees and costs.
The court found that the agreement contained no objectionable release, confidentiality, or non-disparagement provisions. Escoto’s release applied only to claims connected to his wage-and-hour allegations, including his FLSA and NYLL claims.
Ruling
Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the motion for settlement approval. The court directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions identified as Documents 66 and 67 and close the case.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.