Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 18, 2024

Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC.

Judge
Edward Chen
Docket
3:23-cv-00871
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC, Judge Chen denied Michael Floyd’s request for a letter recommending probation in his separate state case.

Who this affects

Michael Devin Floyd’s request for a federal recommendation in his separate state sentencing proceeding was denied; the order did not resolve his claims against 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC.

What happened

In Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC, Michael Devin Floyd is suing 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC over the termination of his gym membership. He told the federal court that he was scheduled for sentencing in Santa Clara Superior Court.

Floyd asked the federal court to issue a letter confirming that he was litigating this and other federal cases and recommending probation in the state case. He said this was needed because he was an inexperienced self-represented litigant who could be in custody.

Judge Edward Chen denied the request. He ruled that the federal and state proceedings were independent and that it would be improper for the federal court to recommend how the state court should decide its case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC. · No. 3:23-cv-00871
Judge
Edward Chen
Date
Nov. 18, 2024

Background

Michael Devin Floyd sued 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC, asserting claims related to the termination of his gym membership. The order concerns a separate request by Floyd, not the merits of those claims.

Request

Floyd told the court that he was scheduled for sentencing in Santa Clara Superior Court. He asked the federal court to issue a letter stating that he was litigating this lawsuit and several other lawsuits in the Northern District of California. He also asked the court to recommend probation in the state case, stating that justice could not be served in the federal cases if he were held in custody as an inexperienced self-represented litigant.

Ruling

Judge Edward Chen denied the request for relief. The court explained that the federal and state proceedings were completely independent. It held that it would be improper for the federal court to recommend how the state court should decide its case or otherwise weigh in on the state proceeding. The order did not decide Floyd’s claims against 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC.

Disposition

The request for a probation referral was denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.