Jones v. Segal
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:24-cv-03671
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Jones v. Segal, Judge Menendez dismissed Jones’s action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Vontia Jones’s action was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The opinion does not describe any further effect on Michael Segal.
What happened
In Jones v. Segal, Vontia Jones did not object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation that the case be dismissed because she failed to prosecute it.
The court reviewed the recommendation and case record for clear error because no objection was filed. It found no error.
Judge Katherine M. Menendez accepted the recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
The detailed version
- Jones v. Segal · No. 0:24-cv-03671
- Katherine Menendez
- Nov. 20, 2024
Background
The matter came before the court on a report and recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung, dated October 21, 2024. Judge Leung recommended dismissing the case for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The opinion states that Vontia Jones did not object to the recommendation.
Court’s Review
When no specific objection is made to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court reviews it for clear error. After reviewing the recommendation and the record, the court found no error, clear or otherwise.
Ruling
The court accepted the report and recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The order directed that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.