Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2024

Sompheth P. v. United States

Judge
Katherine Menendez
Docket
0:24-cv-03849
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sompheth P. v. United States, Judge Menendez dismissed the habeas case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Sompheth P.’s petition was denied without prejudice, and the case was dismissed without prejudice; the United States of America was the respondent.

What happened

Sompheth P. filed a petition asking for a court order concerning detention or custody, but the opinion does not describe the petition’s underlying claims. A magistrate judge recommended dismissal without prejudice because the court lacked authority to hear those claims.

Sompheth P. did not object to the recommendation. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Menendez accepted the recommendation, denied the petition without prejudice, and dismissed the case without prejudice. The court did not decide the underlying habeas claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sompheth P. v. United States · No. 0:24-cv-03849
Judge
Katherine Menendez
Date
Nov. 20, 2024

Background

Sompheth P. filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against the United States of America. The opinion does not describe the petition’s specific claims. United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation dated October 24, 2022, recommending that the matter be dismissed without prejudice because the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction—the legal power to hear the claims.

Review

Sompheth P. did not object to the Report and Recommendation. Because there were no objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court stated that its review of the recommendation and the record revealed no error.

Ruling

The court accepted the Report and Recommendation, denied Sompheth P.’s habeas petition without prejudice, and dismissed the case without prejudice. The opinion did not reach the merits of the petition’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.