Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2024

Silver v. Ghee

Docket
3:24-cv-03593
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Silver v. Ghee, the court dismissed Michael John Silver’s screened civil-rights complaint; the opinion does not supply the judge’s full name.

Who this affects

Michael John Silver’s complaint was dismissed, ending this case against the deputy clerk and the Alameda County Superior Court.

What happened

In Silver v. Ghee, Michael John Silver, a state prisoner representing himself, sued a deputy clerk and the Alameda County Superior Court. He alleged that the clerk mishandled a petition related to a request under the federal Freedom of Information Act and violated his right to due process.

The court dismissed the case during required prisoner-complaint screening for failure to state a claim. It ruled that the courthouse is not a person that can be sued under the civil-rights statute and that the clerk was immune from money damages for filing and processing court petitions because those tasks are part of the judicial process.

The court ordered the clerk to enter judgment and close the file. The opinion is signed only with the initials “TR” and does not supply the judge’s full name.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Silver v. Ghee · No. 3:24-cv-03593
Date
Nov. 20, 2024

Background

Michael John Silver, a state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a complaint against a deputy clerk at the Alameda County Superior Court and the courthouse. He alleged that the clerk did not properly file and process his petition for a writ of mandate, through which he attempted to make a Freedom of Information Act request from the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration. He claimed a due-process violation and sought money damages.

The court stated that it was screening the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which requires federal courts to review prisoner complaints seeking relief from governmental entities or their employees. The court must dismiss claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim, or seek money from an immune defendant. It also explained that a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 requires an alleged violation of a federal right by a person acting under state law.

Court’s Analysis

The court ruled that the courthouse could not be sued under § 1983 because it is not a “person” within the meaning of that statute. It also explained that court clerks and their employees have absolute immunity from damages for functions that are integral or necessary to the judicial process. Filing and processing petitions fell within that category, so the clerk was immune from Silver’s claim for money damages.

Disposition

The case was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the file. The opinion does not state that the dismissal was with or without prejudice. The judge’s full name is not supplied; the signature shows only the initials “TR.”

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.