Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2024

Davis v. The Bank of New York Mellon

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:24-cv-07303
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Davis v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Judge Woods denied a filing-fee refund and closed Davis’s voluntarily withdrawn case.

Who this affects

Corey Davis, who sought to withdraw the case and obtain a filing-fee refund; The Bank of New York Mellon, whose case was closed.

What happened

In Davis v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Corey Davis, representing himself, asked to withdraw the case. He also asked the court to order a refund of the filing fee.

The court treated Davis’s request as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The opinion does not state that Davis’s request was opposed.

Judge Woods denied the request for a filing-fee refund, directed the Clerk to terminate all pending motions and close the case, and directed the Clerk to mail Davis a copy of the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Davis v. The Bank of New York Mellon · No. 1:24-cv-07303
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Nov. 20, 2024

Background

Corey Davis, who appeared without a lawyer, moved to “voluntarily withdraw” the matter. The court construed that request as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). Davis also asked the Clerk of Court to refund the filing fee.

Court’s ruling

The court denied Davis’s request for a filing-fee refund. It relied on the rule that, once a filing fee has been collected, it cannot be waived or refunded regardless of the action’s outcome.

The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all pending motions and close the case. The Clerk was also directed to mail Davis a copy of the order. The order does not separately state that the case was dismissed with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.