Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 22, 2024

Howell v. Regions Hospital

Judge
Jeffrey Bryan
Docket
0:24-cv-03618
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Howell v. Regions Hospital, Judge Bryan dismissed the case without prejudice after adopting a recommendation based on failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

William Howell’s action against Regions Hospital was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

What happened

In Howell v. Regions Hospital, Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz recommended dismissing William Howell’s case without prejudice because Howell failed to prosecute it. Neither party objected to the recommendation.

The district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none. It adopted the recommendation and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan entered the order on November 22, 2024, and directed that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Howell v. Regions Hospital · No. 0:24-cv-03618
Judge
Jeffrey M. Bryan
Date
Nov. 22, 2024

Background

William Howell, who represented himself, sued Regions Hospital. The matter came before the court on a report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated October 9, 2024. The recommendation proposed dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Howell failed to prosecute the action.

Neither party filed objections, and the time for doing so had passed.

Court’s Review and Ruling

Because no timely objections were filed, the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error. The court found no clear error, adopted the report and recommendation, and dismissed the matter without prejudice. The order also directed that judgment be entered.

The opinion does not address the underlying merits of Howell’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.