Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 25, 2024

Weise v. U.S. Department of State

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:24-cv-05760
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Weise v. U.S. Department of State, Judge Liman ordered service of Weise’s lawsuit through the U.S. Marshals Service.

Who this affects

Wolfgang Weise and the U.S. Department of State; the order also directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to complete service.

What happened

In Weise v. U.S. Department of State, Wolfgang Weise, representing himself, asked the court to require the State Department to act on his updated passport application and to award money damages. The court treated the request as seeking a court order under a federal law that can require a government officer to perform a duty.

The court had already allowed Weise to proceed without paying filing fees upfront. Because he received that permission, the court directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the Department of State. The court also stated that the service deadline would run for 90 days after the summons is issued and instructed Weise to request more time if service is not completed.

Judge Lewis J. Liman ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service paperwork, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Weise is entitled to passport-related relief or money damages.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Weise v. U.S. Department of State · No. 1:24-cv-05760
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Nov. 25, 2024

Background

Wolfgang Weise, who is representing himself, sued the U.S. Department of State seeking action on his updated passport application and money damages. The court construed the complaint as seeking mandamus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1361, meaning a court order requiring a government official or agency to perform a legally required duty. The opinion does not decide whether that relief is warranted.

The court had granted Weise permission to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without paying filing fees in advance, in an order dated August 5, 2024.

Service Order

Because Weise was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The Clerk of Court was instructed to issue a summons, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for the Department of State, mark the form for service on the United States, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to complete service.

The court explained that the usual 90-day service period could not begin before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons issued. It therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Weise should request an extension of time. The court also directed Weise to notify the court in writing if his address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition and Scope

The court directed the Clerk to carry out the service steps and to mail an information package to Weise. This was an order concerning service of process; it did not resolve Weise’s request concerning his passport application or his request for money damages.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.