Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2024

Hanson v. Bureau of Prisons

Judge
Pitts
Docket
5:24-cv-07170
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hanson v. Bureau of Prisons, Judge Pitts dismissed the case without prejudice after Hanson voluntarily withdrew her action.

Who this affects

Denise Dana Hanson and the Bureau of Prisons; the action was dismissed without prejudice and the file was closed.

What happened

In Hanson v. Bureau of Prisons, Denise Dana Hanson, a prisoner representing herself, sent the court a letter about medical treatment and confinement conditions at correctional institutions. The court opened a new case, but Hanson later said she did not intend to file one.

Hanson asked the court to dismiss the action. The court treated her request as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), which allows dismissal before the defendant serves an answer or a summary-judgment motion.

Judge P. Casey Pitts ruled that Hanson’s notice met the rule’s requirements and dismissed the case without prejudice. The clerk was ordered to terminate all pending motions and close the file.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hanson v. Bureau of Prisons · No. 5:24-cv-07170
Judge
Pitts
Date
Dec. 4, 2024

Background

Denise Dana Hanson, a pro se prisoner at FCI Pekin, sent the court a letter raising several claims about medical treatment and conditions of confinement at various correctional institutions. The court opened a new action to protect her rights, and filed the letter as the complaint on October 15, 2024.

Hanson later notified the court that she did not intend to file a new complaint and requested dismissal. The court construed her request as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

Rule and analysis

The court explained that a plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing a notice before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Under the rule, the dismissal is without prejudice unless the plaintiff states otherwise.

The court found that Hanson’s notice met the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1).

Disposition

The case was DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk was ordered to terminate all pending motions and close the file.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.