Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2024

Lamb v. Forbes Media LLC

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:22-cv-06319
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Lamb v. Forbes Media LLC, Judge Carter stayed the action pending mediation and ordered a January 3, 2025 joint status report.

Who this affects

The parties to Lamb v. Forbes Media LLC, including the plaintiffs and Forbes Media LLC, must pause the action pending mediation and submit a joint status report by January 3, 2025.

What happened

Lamb v. Forbes Media LLC concerns the parties’ joint request to pause the case while they pursue formal mediation. The parties told the court they had agreed to mediate, were selecting a mediator, and expected mediation in late February or early March.

The parties asked for the stay before the plaintiffs’ December 5, 2024 deadline to file an amended complaint. They said a stay would reduce costs, promote efficient use of judicial resources, and improve the chances of resolving the case through mediation.

Judge Andrew L. Carter stayed the action pending formal mediation and ordered the parties to file a joint status report about settlement discussions by January 3, 2025. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lamb v. Forbes Media LLC · No. 1:22-cv-06319
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Dec. 4, 2024

Background

The parties jointly requested a stay, meaning a temporary pause in the litigation, while they pursued formal mediation. The parties stated that they had agreed to mediate, were selecting a mediator, and expected the mediation to occur in late February or early March.

The request came before the plaintiffs’ then-current deadline to file an amended complaint. That deadline was December 5, 2024, based on an earlier court order tied to the issuance of a mandate in a separate Second Circuit case.

Parties’ Position

The parties argued that a stay would support meaningful settlement discussions, reduce litigation costs, promote judicial economy, and potentially resolve the action completely. They jointly asked the court to stay the action pending mediation.

Court’s Action

The court stayed the action pending formal mediation. It also ordered the parties to submit a joint status report regarding settlement discussions on or before January 3, 2025. The order addressed the pause in litigation and settlement process; it did not resolve the underlying claims.

Disposition

The action was stayed pending formal mediation, and the parties were ordered to file the specified joint status report.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.