Estarellas v. 1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Funds
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-06996
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Estarellas v. 1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Fund, Judge Vyskocil ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant.
Rosario Estarellas, who is representing herself, and 1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Fund. The order also directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to carry out service.
What happened
Rosario Estarellas, representing herself, sued 1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Fund under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The court had allowed her to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.
Because she was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court ordered the Clerk to issue a summons and provide the U.S. Marshals Service with the documents and address needed to serve the defendant. Service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued, or Estarellas should ask for more time.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also directed the Clerk to mail Estarellas an information package. Estarellas must notify the court in writing if her address changes; the court warned that the case could be dismissed if she does not do so.
The detailed version
- Estarellas v. 1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Funds · No. 1:24-cv-06996
- Vyskocil
- Dec. 9, 2024
Background
Rosario Estarellas brought an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and is representing herself. In an earlier order, the court granted her permission to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning she could proceed without prepaying court fees.
Service of process
Because Estarellas was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court explained that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve 1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Fund. The Clerk of Court was instructed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, issue a summons, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The order lists the defendant’s service address as 498 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10018.
The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after the summons is issued because Estarellas could not have served the defendant before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons issued. If service is not completed within that period, Estarellas should request an extension of time. She must also notify the court in writing if her address changes, and the court stated that it may dismiss the action if she fails to do so.
Ruling
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, prepare the service form, and provide the documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Estarellas an information package. The order allowed her to request electronic delivery of court documents by completing a consent form. This order addressed service and case administration; it did not decide the merits of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.