Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 10, 2024

Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp v. Daniloff

Judge
Victor Marrero
Docket
1:17-cv-04181
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp. v. Daniloff, Judge Marrero granted permission to file specified turnover-motion exhibits under seal.

Who this affects

Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp. may file the specified exhibits supporting its turnover motion under seal; the materials include confidential information produced by Hanaco and PleoPharma.

What happened

In Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp. v. Daniloff, Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp. asked to file certain materials under seal while seeking a turnover order to enforce its judgment against Elliot Daniloff.

The requested materials included exhibits containing information produced by Hanaco and PleoPharma under confidentiality agreements, along with limited portions of Bloomfield’s supporting memorandum that referred to those exhibits.

The court granted the request and gave Bloomfield permission to file the exhibits supporting its turnover motion under seal. Judge Victor Marrero signed the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp v. Daniloff · No. 1:17-cv-04181
Judge
Victor Marrero
Date
Dec. 10, 2024

Background

The opinion is a letter request by Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp., identified as the judgment creditor, to file materials under seal in connection with a forthcoming motion for a turnover order. The materials concern post-judgment discovery obtained from nonparties PleoPharma, Inc. and entities collectively identified as Hanaco.

The letter states that the court entered a judgment against Elliot Daniloff totaling $33,409,179, plus interest. Bloomfield sought to use discovery from PleoPharma and Hanaco to support post-judgment enforcement. The producing nonparties had designated some of the information as confidential under confidentiality agreements.

Request

Bloomfield asked for permission to file under seal Exhibit C, Hanaco’s responses and objections to Bloomfield’s information subpoena; Exhibits D, I, and M, documents designated confidential by Hanaco; and Exhibit O, a document designated confidential by PleoPharma. Bloomfield also sought to redact limited portions of its supporting memorandum that referred to those exhibits.

Ruling

The court’s order states: “Request GRANTED.” The court gave Bloomfield permission to file the exhibits supporting its turnover motion under seal. The order does not separately state a disposition for the requested redactions to the memorandum.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.