Tobar v. Current or Acting Field Office Director
Tobar v. Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Sallie Kim
- 3:24-cv-08550
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Tobar v. Current or Acting Field Office Director, Judge Kim transferred Tobar’s detention challenge to the Eastern District of California.
Walter Aparicio Tobar and the respondents in his immigration-detention case; the matter will proceed in the Eastern District of California.
What happened
Walter Aparicio Tobar, who was representing himself, filed a petition challenging his continued immigration detention at the Golden State Annex detention center in McFarland, California. The case was filed in the Northern District of California.
The court explained that a petition challenging a person’s physical detention generally must be filed in the federal district where that person is held. Because the detention center is in Kern County, which is in the Eastern District of California, the Northern District was not the proper district for this petition.
Judge Sallie Kim transferred the detention petition, the request to proceed without paying filing fees, and the request for appointed counsel to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The court did not decide the substance of Tobar’s detention challenge.
The detailed version
- Tobar v. Current or Acting Field Office Director · No. 3:24-cv-08550
- Sallie Kim
- Dec. 11, 2024
Background
Walter Aparicio Tobar, identified in the opinion as a citizen of Guatemala, filed a self-represented petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He challenged his prolonged detention by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the Golden State Annex detention center in McFarland, California. He also moved for permission to proceed without paying filing fees and for appointment of counsel.
Venue and jurisdiction
The court relied on the federal habeas statute’s limitation that district courts may grant habeas relief only within their respective jurisdictions. It explained that a core habeas petition challenging present physical confinement generally must be filed in the single federal district where the petitioner is confined. The court stated that this rule applies to petitions challenging immigration detention.
Tobar was detained in McFarland, in Kern County. The court determined that Kern County is within the Eastern District of California. It therefore concluded that the petition belonged in that district rather than the Northern District of California.
Disposition
The court transferred the § 2241 petition, the motion for permission to proceed without paying filing fees, and the motion for appointment of counsel to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The clerk was directed to transfer the case immediately. The order did not decide whether Tobar’s detention was lawful.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.