Padilla v. Quick Stop Deli and Convenience Inc
- Philip Halpern
- 7:24-cv-04642
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Padilla v. Quick Stop Deli, Judge Halpern ordered the parties to file settlement papers or a Rule 68 judgment after mediation resolved all issues.
The parties to the case, who were required to file the specified settlement documents or a proposed Rule 68 judgment by January 3, 2025.
What happened
In Padilla v. Quick Stop Deli and Convenience Inc., the docket showed that the parties had participated in mediation and reached an agreement on all issues.
The order did not describe the underlying claims or state that the court had approved the settlement. Instead, it required the parties to submit additional documents by January 3, 2025.
Judge Philip M. Halpern ordered the parties to file either a joint submission under the required settlement-review process with a signed settlement agreement, or a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.
The detailed version
- Padilla v. Quick Stop Deli and Convenience Inc · No. 7:24-cv-04642
- Philip Halpern
- Dec. 16, 2024
Background
Jorge Padilla brought the case on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Quick Stop Deli and Convenience Inc. and other defendants. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. The docket indicated that mediation had been held and that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues.
Order
The court ordered the parties to file, by January 3, 2025, either a joint submission under the settlement-review procedure identified by the court, together with a fully executed proposed settlement agreement, or a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68. The order cites Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc. for that procedure.
Effect
Judge Philip M. Halpern directed the parties to submit one of those two sets of documents. The opinion does not say that the court approved the settlement, entered judgment, or otherwise ended the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.