Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 17, 2024

Bennett v. Minnesota Department of Corrections

Judge
Nancy Brasel
Docket
0:24-cv-03244
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bennett v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, Judge Leung recommended dismissing the case without prejudice and denying Bennett’s fee application as moot.

Who this affects

Cassandra Hope Bennett, and the Minnesota Department of Corrections and Paul Schnell as defendants in the action.

What happened

In Bennett v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, the court addressed Cassandra Hope Bennett’s failure to pay an initial filing fee required in the case.

The court had ordered Bennett to pay at least $57.47 by September 10, 2024, but she did not submit the required fee. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims against the Minnesota Department of Corrections or Paul Schnell.

Judge Tony N. Leung recommended dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute and denying Bennett’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs as moot. The recommendation was not a final order or judgment of the District Court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bennett v. Minnesota Department of Corrections · No. 0:24-cv-03244
Judge
Nancy Brasel
Date
Sept. 17, 2024

Background

On August 20, 2024, the court ordered Plaintiff Cassandra Hope Bennett to pay an initial partial filing fee of at least $57.47. The court gave her 21 days, until September 10, 2024, to pay the fee and stated that failure to do so would lead to a recommendation that the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Bennett did not submit the required fee. The opinion does not address the merits of her claims against the Minnesota Department of Corrections or Paul Schnell.

Recommendation

Judge Tony N. Leung recommended that the action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. A dismissal without prejudice does not bar refiling based on the dismissal itself. The court also recommended denying Bennett’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs as moot, meaning the application no longer required a ruling because of the recommended dismissal.

This document is a Report and Recommendation, not an order or judgment of the District Court. The notice states that it is not directly appealable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and that objections could be filed within 14 days after service.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.