Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 1, 2024

Turner v. Reden

Judge
Oberto
Docket
3:24-cv-07718
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Anthony R. Turner v. Reden, Judge Oberto transferred the civil-rights case to the Northern District of California because venue was improper in the Eastern District.

Who this affects

Anthony R. Turner’s case and the named defendants are affected because the action was transferred from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California.

What happened

In Anthony R. Turner v. Reden, Turner, a patient at Napa State Hospital representing himself, filed a civil-rights lawsuit under a federal law allowing claims against government officials. The opinion says the defendants do not reside in the Eastern District of California, and the claims arose in Napa County.

The court concluded that the case belonged in the Northern District of California. It transferred the case there in the interest of justice rather than keeping it in the Eastern District.

Judge Sheila K. Oberto ordered the transfer on November 1, 2024. The order addresses the location of the case and does not decide whether Turner’s underlying claims are valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Turner v. Reden · No. 3:24-cv-07718
Judge
Oberto
Date
Nov. 1, 2024

Background

Anthony R. Turner, identified as a patient at Napa State Hospital, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while representing himself. The case was filed in the Eastern District of California.

Venue analysis

The court applied the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute generally allows a civil case to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction.

The court found that none of the defendants reside in the Eastern District of California. It also found that the claims arose in Napa County, which is in the Northern District of California. The court therefore concluded that the case should have been filed in the Northern District.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district in the interest of justice. The court ordered that this matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order did not decide the merits of Turner’s civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.