Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 27, 2024

Xiuling Wei v. Yahoo, Inc.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09077
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureDiscoveryPro Se
In one sentence

In Xiuling Wei v. Yahoo, Chief Judge Swain closed the wrongly opened civil action and ordered a new miscellaneous case for the discovery application.

Who this affects

Xiuling Wei, Weiguo Wang, Yipeng Wang, and Anastasiia Marchuk must pursue the § 1782 application in a new miscellaneous case and must pay the $52 fee or submit individual applications to proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Xiuling Wei v. Yahoo, Inc., Xiuling Wei, Weiguo Wang, Yipeng Wang, and Anastasiia Marchuk, representing themselves, applied under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for permission to obtain discovery for use in a foreign proceeding. They also submitted a form indicating they were bringing a civil case against Yahoo, Inc., but they did not pay the filing fee or submit applications to proceed without prepaying it.

The Clerk opened the matter as a new civil action. The court determined that an application for discovery for use in a foreign proceeding should instead be opened as a miscellaneous matter. It directed the Clerk to close the civil action, open a new miscellaneous case, transfer the filings, and process the matter under the Clerk’s procedures.

Chief Judge Swain ordered each petitioner to pay the $52 miscellaneous-case fee within 30 days or submit a completed and signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, stating that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Xiuling Wei v. Yahoo, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-09077
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 27, 2024

Background

Xiuling Wei, Weiguo Wang, Yipeng Wang, and Anastasiia Marchuk, appearing without lawyers, submitted an application under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for an order permitting discovery for use in a foreign proceeding. They also submitted a civil cover sheet indicating that they were bringing a civil proceeding against Yahoo, Inc. The petitioners did not pay the filing fee or submit applications to proceed without prepaying fees.

The Clerk treated the application as a new complaint and opened it as civil action No. 24-CV-9077 (LTS). The court explained that an application seeking discovery for use in a foreign proceeding under § 1782 should be opened as a miscellaneous matter instead of as a civil action.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to: (1) close the civil action without prejudice to the petitioners litigating their claims in the miscellaneous case; (2) open a new miscellaneous case; (3) docket the order, application, and other filings in that case; and (4) process the matter under the Clerk’s Office procedures. The order addresses the case’s classification and processing; it does not state whether the requested discovery will ultimately be permitted.

Fee and Appeal Requirements

Within 30 days of the order, the petitioners must pay the $52 fee for filing a miscellaneous action or, for each petitioner seeking to proceed without prepaying fees, submit a completed and signed application to do so. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.