Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 3, 2025

Hibbert v. The State of New York

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:22-cv-08257
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hibbert v. City of New York, Judge Garnett dismissed the case with prejudice because Hibbert failed to pursue it.

Who this affects

The dismissal affects Conroy Hibbert, Jr.'s action against the City of New York and the other defendants identified in the case caption. The court directed that all pending motions be terminated and that the case be closed.

What happened

In Conroy Hibbert, Jr. v. City of New York, et al., Hibbert was representing himself. The court had ordered him to explain why the case should not be dismissed and to report on its status by December 19, 2024.

The deadline passed without a response. Hibbert also did not otherwise indicate that he intended to continue the case.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett dismissed the action with prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute, terminated all pending motions, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case and mail Hibbert a copy of the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hibbert v. The State of New York · No. 1:22-cv-08257
Judge
Garnett
Date
Jan. 3, 2025

Background

Conroy Hibbert, Jr., who was representing himself, brought this action against the City of New York and other defendants. On October 24, 2024, the court ordered Hibbert to show why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court required him to submit a letter reporting on the status of the action by December 19, 2024, and warned that missing the deadline could result in prompt dismissal with prejudice. The order was mailed to Hibbert at the address he had provided.

Reason for dismissal

The deadline passed, and the court received no response from Hibbert. He also did not otherwise indicate that he intended to pursue the case. Rule 41(b) permits a district court to dismiss an action when a plaintiff fails to prosecute or fails to comply with a court order. The court stated that it had notified Hibbert before dismissing the action.

Ruling

Judge Margaret M. Garnett dismissed the action with prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The order also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all pending motions, close the case, and mail a copy of the order to Hibbert.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.