Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 3, 2025

TufAmerica, Inc. v. Universal Music Publishing, Inc.

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:24-cv-02585
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In TufAmerica v. Songs of Universal, Judge Ho granted the parties’ request to stay discovery pending resolution of defendant’s motion to dismiss.

Who this affects

TufAmerica, Inc. d/b/a Tuff City Records and Songs of Universal, Inc.; all discovery deadlines in their case are paused until the court resolves Songs of Universal’s motion to dismiss.

What happened

TufAmerica, Inc. d/b/a Tuff City Records sued Songs of Universal, Inc. over an alleged uncleared sample in the composition “Real Love.” The parties asked the court to pause discovery while Songs of Universal’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint was pending.

The court granted the request. It stayed all discovery deadlines until the court resolves the defendant’s motion to dismiss, which argues that the two works are not substantially similar as a matter of law. The order did not decide that motion or the copyright dispute.

Judge Dale E. Ho also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF Nos. 54 and 65.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
TufAmerica, Inc. v. Universal Music Publishing, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-02585
Judge
Ho
Date
Jan. 3, 2025

Background

TufAmerica, Inc. d/b/a Tuff City Records alleged that the composition “Real Love” contains an uncleared sample from its composition “Impeach the President.” After TufAmerica filed an amended complaint, Songs of Universal, Inc. moved to dismiss, arguing in part that the works were not substantially similar as a matter of law.

The parties had exchanged initial disclosures, but had not yet served document requests or interrogatories. The proposed discovery could involve authorship and ownership of “Impeach the President,” agreements concerning that composition, the creation of “Real Love,” consent relating to another composition called “Top Billin’,” the fame and popularity of “Real Love,” and damages. The parties also anticipated expert discovery. Because the works were released decades earlier, the parties stated that locating documents and witnesses could be difficult.

Request to Stay Discovery

The parties requested a stay of discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), which allows a court to pause discovery for good cause. The court considered the expected breadth and burden of discovery, the strength of the pending motion to dismiss, and whether TufAmerica would be prejudiced by a delay.

The request was joined by TufAmerica, although TufAmerica did not join Songs of Universal’s assertions and arguments and reserved the right to submit its own letter. Songs of Universal alternatively requested revised case-management and scheduling deadlines if discovery was not stayed.

Ruling

Judge Dale E. Ho granted the application. The court stayed all discovery deadlines pending its resolution of Songs of Universal’s motion to dismiss and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF Nos. 54 and 65. The order did not resolve the motion to dismiss or determine whether copyright infringement occurred.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.