Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 8, 2025

Burzdak v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc.

Judge
Edward Chen
Docket
3:21-cv-02148
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Class ActionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Burzdak v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc., Judge Chen appointed the Consumer Federation of California to receive the remaining settlement funds.

Who this affects

The absent class members and the Consumer Federation of California are affected: CFC will receive the remaining settlement-fund balance, which the court ordered distributed within 30 days.

What happened

In Burzdak v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc., 2,519 settlement checks totaling $43,703.18 remained uncashed after redistribution. The plaintiff said another redistribution was not practical, so the settlement agreement allowed the remaining funds to go to a court-approved recipient.

The court considered whether the proposed recipient had a strong connection to the class members’ interests and the lawsuit. The Consumer Federation of California focuses on protecting California consumers, including from unwanted subscriptions and recurring fees. The proposed class was limited to California consumers, the parties and their lawyers had no relationship with the organization, and Universal Screen Arts did not object.

Judge Edward M. Chen appointed the Consumer Federation of California as the recipient and ordered distribution of the remaining settlement-fund balance within 30 days of the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Burzdak v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc. · No. 3:21-cv-02148
Judge
Edward Chen
Date
Jan. 8, 2025

Background

The court issued an order appointing the Consumer Federation of California (CFC) as the cy pres recipient. A cy pres recipient is an organization that receives unclaimed settlement funds when distributing those funds to class members is not feasible and the organization’s work is sufficiently connected to the class’s interests.

The plaintiff submitted a supplemental accounting after a redistribution of uncashed settlement funds. As of December 13, 2024, 2,519 checks totaling $43,703.18 remained uncashed. The plaintiff stated that redistributing the balance was not administratively feasible. The settlement agreement provided that, if redistribution was not feasible, the funds could be distributed to a court-approved cy pres recipient.

Court’s Analysis

The court applied the Ninth Circuit’s requirement that a cy pres recipient have a substantial connection to the interests of the class members. The court also considered the Northern District of California’s class-action settlement guidelines, which require an explanation of how the recipient relates to the lawsuit and the class members’ claims, as well as disclosure of any relationship between the parties or their lawyers and the proposed recipient.

CFC works to protect California consumers and has focused, among other things, on protections against automatically renewing membership fees. The proposed class was limited to California consumers. The court concluded that giving CFC the funds was likely to advance absent class members’ interests by supporting protections against automatically renewing fees. The court also noted that the parties and their counsel had no relationship with CFC, and that the defendant did not object.

Ruling

The court appointed CFC as the cy pres recipient and ordered distribution of the remaining Settlement Fund balance within 30 days of the order. The order was signed by United States District Judge Edward M. Chen.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.