Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 7, 2025

Boadi v. Stamford Uniform Linen Towel And Napkin, LLC

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-00010
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Boadi v. Stamford Uniform, Judge Furman ordered defendants to correct defective diversity allegations or face remand to state court.

Who this affects

The defendants must correct the allegations supporting federal diversity jurisdiction and serve the order. The case may be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, County of Bronx, if they cannot truthfully establish complete diversity of citizenship.

What happened

In Boadi v. Stamford Uniform Linen Towel And Napkin, LLC, the defendants removed the case from New York state court to federal court, claiming the parties were citizens of different states.

Judge Furman found that the removal papers stated the parties’ residences rather than their citizenships. The papers also identified two members of the limited liability company but did not say whether they were the company’s only members.

Judge Furman ordered the defendants to amend their removal notice by January 14, 2025, and to serve the order on the plaintiff. If they could not truthfully show complete diversity of citizenship, the court said it would remand the case to the Supreme Court of New York, County of Bronx.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Boadi v. Stamford Uniform Linen Towel And Napkin, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-00010
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Jan. 7, 2025

Background

Defendants Stamford Uniform Linen Towel and Napkin, LLC and Reynaldo Mesa Graciano Jr. filed a notice removing the action from state court to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. They invoked federal subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c) and asserted that the action involved citizens of different states. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Jurisdictional deficiencies

The court found several problems with the allegations supporting diversity jurisdiction. First, the notice alleged the residency—not the citizenship—of Plaintiff Joseph Boadi and the members of the LLC. Residence alone does not establish citizenship for diversity purposes; citizenship generally depends on domicile.

Second, the notice identified two members of Stamford Uniform Linen Towel and Napkin, LLC but did not state that they were the LLC’s only members. To establish an LLC’s citizenship, the removing party must identify the citizenship of every member. If an LLC member is itself an LLC, the notice must also establish the citizenship of all members of that entity. For corporate members, the relevant allegations include the place of incorporation and principal place of business.

Order

The court ordered the defendants to amend their notice of removal by January 14, 2025, to cure the deficiencies in their subject-matter-jurisdiction allegations. If they could not truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship, the action would be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, County of Bronx, without further notice. The defendants also had to serve Plaintiff with the order within two business days and file proof of service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.