Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 8, 2025

Peguero-Carela v. Jaimison

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:23-cv-04025
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Peguero-Carela v. Jaimison, Judge Torres adopted the recommendation and denied Peguero-Carela’s federal petition.

Who this affects

The order denied Jacobo Peguero-Carela’s petition and closed the case; it was entered against respondent J.L. Jaimison, Warden.

What happened

In Peguero-Carela v. Jaimison, Jacobo Peguero-Carela filed a federal petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He represented himself, and the government opposed the petition.

Judge Katharine H. Parker recommended denying the petition. Peguero-Carela was notified that he could object but filed no objections before the deadline.

Judge Analisa Torres found no clear error in the recommendation, adopted it in full, and denied Peguero-Carela’s petition. The court directed the clerk to close the case and mail the order to Peguero-Carela.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Peguero-Carela v. Jaimison · No. 1:23-cv-04025
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Jan. 8, 2025

Background

Jacobo Peguero-Carela filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a federal procedure for challenging certain forms of custody or detention. The opinion states that Peguero-Carela represented himself. The respondent was identified as J.L. Jaimison, Warden.

The court referred the petition to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. After receiving the government’s opposition and Peguero-Carela’s reply, Judge Parker issued a report and recommendation advising that the petition be denied.

Court’s Review

Peguero-Carela received notice of his right to object to the report and recommendation but filed no objections. Because no objections were filed, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake apparent from the record. The opinion states that the court found no clear error in Judge Parker’s recommendation.

Ruling

Judge Analisa Torres adopted Judge Parker’s report and recommendation in its entirety and denied Peguero-Carela’s petition. The clerk was directed to close the case and mail a copy of the order to Peguero-Carela. This order does not explain the underlying reason Judge Parker recommended denying the petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.