Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 10, 2025

Insured Advocacy Group, LLC v. Spartan Services Corp.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:23-cv-07212
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Insured Advocacy Group v. Spartan Services, Judge Liman rescheduled a conference to address counsel’s withdrawal and discovery status.

Who this affects

The parties, Defendant’s counsel, and Spartan Services Corp., whose representative must attend and which may need to obtain new counsel if the withdrawal motion is granted.

What happened

In Insured Advocacy Group, LLC v. Spartan Services Corp., the court rescheduled a post-discovery conference that had been set for January 17, 2025.

The conference was moved to 4 p.m. that day so the court could hear Defendant’s counsel on a motion to withdraw and hear from the parties about discovery, which was scheduled to close on January 15. A representative of Spartan Services Corp. was ordered to attend. The court warned that a corporation cannot appear in federal court without a lawyer and that, if the withdrawal motion is granted, Spartan would need to promptly obtain new counsel or risk default.

Judge Lewis J. Liman did not decide the motion to withdraw in this order; he rescheduled the conference and issued related attendance and representation instructions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Insured Advocacy Group, LLC v. Spartan Services Corp. · No. 1:23-cv-07212
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Jan. 10, 2025

Order

The court rescheduled the post-discovery conference from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on January 17, 2025.

Matters to Be Addressed

At the conference, the court will hear Defendant’s counsel regarding a motion to withdraw filed January 9, 2025, at Docket No. 116. The court will also hear from the parties about the status of discovery, which was scheduled to close on January 15, 2025.

Attendance and Counsel

The court directed a representative of Spartan Services Corp. to attend the conference and address the motion to withdraw. The court reminded Spartan that corporate entities may not appear in federal court without an attorney. The court stated that, if it grants the motion to withdraw, Spartan will have to promptly obtain new counsel or risk default.

Disposition

The order reschedules the conference and gives related instructions. It does not state that the court granted or denied the motion to withdraw.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.