Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 12, 2025

Rosario v. Majestic Restaurant Inc

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:23-cv-11042
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

Rosario v. Majestic Restaurant: Judge Rearden vacated the default and denied Rosario’s default-judgment motion as moot.

Who this affects

Rosarina Rosario, Majestic Restaurant Inc., and Henry Rodriguez. The default was vacated, the default-judgment motion was denied as moot, and the defendants must respond to the complaint and participate in mediation.

What happened

In Rosario v. Majestic Restaurant Inc., Rosarina Rosario sued Majestic Restaurant Inc. and Henry Rodriguez. After they were served, neither defendant responded or appeared by the deadline.

Rosario obtained a certificate of default and later moved for default judgment. Defendants’ counsel appeared and asked the court to vacate the certificate; Rosario did not oppose that request.

Judge Rearden granted Defendants’ motion to vacate the Certificate of Default and denied Rosario’s motion for default judgment as moot. The defendants must respond to the complaint by February 3, 2025, and the parties must participate in early mediation.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rosario v. Majestic Restaurant Inc · No. 1:23-cv-11042
Judge
Rearden
Date
Jan. 12, 2025

Background

Rosarina Rosario filed the complaint on December 20, 2023. She personally served Henry Rodriguez and served Majestic Restaurant Inc. through an authorized officer on January 5, 2024. Their deadline to respond was January 26, 2024, but neither defendant responded or otherwise appeared.

Motions and ruling

Rosario obtained a Certificate of Default as to both defendants on March 29, 2024. Because she had not yet moved for default judgment, the court ordered her to show why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Rosario then moved for default judgment on April 18, 2024.

On May 30, 2024, counsel for the defendants appeared and moved to vacate the Certificate of Default. Rosario stated that she did not oppose the motion. Judge Rearden granted the defendants’ unopposed motion to vacate the Certificate of Default. The court therefore denied Rosario’s motion for default judgment as moot, meaning the court did not decide that motion because vacating the default eliminated the basis for it.

Next steps

The defendants must respond to the complaint by February 3, 2025. The parties must also participate in early mediation through the District’s Mediation Program under the court’s practices for cases brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The clerk was directed to terminate the docket entries for both motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.