Marino v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-03041
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Marino v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by February 12, 2025.
J. Richard Marino and defendants Siegel & Reiner, LLP, Glenn A. Reiner, and Richard H. Del Valle.
What happened
In Marino v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP, the plaintiff told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the case had to be made by February 12, 2025; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the dismissal order on January 13, 2025. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Marino v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP · No. 1:24-cv-03041
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 13, 2025
Background
J. Richard Marino notified the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement's terms.
Court's Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court's calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by February 12, 2025.
The order further stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be refiled. The court did not reach the merits of Marino's claims.
Disposition
The court entered an order of dismissal based on the reported settlement in principle. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order on January 13, 2025.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.