Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 13, 2025

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. New York City Acoustics, Inc.

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:25-cv-00227
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Funds v. New York City Acoustics, Judge Garnett set deadlines for an arbitration-confirmation petition.

Who this affects

The petitioning Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds and New York City Acoustics, Inc., the respondent.

What happened

The Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters funds filed a petition on January 10, 2025, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against New York City Acoustics, Inc. The opinion does not describe the award’s underlying dispute.

Judge Garnett ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by January 31, 2025. New York City Acoustics’s opposition, if any, is due February 21, 2025, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, is due March 7, 2025.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett also ordered the petitioners to serve the petition, supporting papers, and order under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by January 31, and to file proof of service by February 3. The order did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:25-cv-00227
Judge
Garnett
Date
Jan. 13, 2025

Background

On January 10, 2025, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, which is a request for judgment based on the submitted materials when there is no genuine dispute requiring a trial.

Deadlines and Service

The court ordered the petitioners to file any additional materials supporting the petition by January 31, 2025. New York City Acoustics, Inc.’s opposition, if any, is due February 21, 2025. The petitioners’ reply, if any, is due March 7, 2025.

The petitioners must also serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on New York City Acoustics, Inc. under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than January 31, 2025. They must file an affidavit showing that service was completed by February 3, 2025.

Disposition

Judge Margaret M. Garnett issued a scheduling and service order. The opinion did not grant or deny the petition to confirm the arbitration award and did not decide whether the award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.