Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 13, 2025

Richardson v. City of New York

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:25-cv-00287
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Richardson v. City of New York, Judge Swain ordered Devin Richardson to pay filing fees or submit authorization before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Devin Richardson and the continuation of his civil action; the order requires him to pay the fees or submit the required prisoner authorization within 30 days.

What happened

In Richardson v. City of New York, Devin Richardson filed a civil action without a lawyer while incarcerated. He submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront, but he did not submit the required authorization for prison officials to deduct payments from his account.

The court gave Richardson 30 days to either pay $405 in fees or submit the prisoner authorization. No summons would issue at that time. If he did not comply, the action would be dismissed without prejudice, meaning the order did not bar him from filing again.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Richardson v. City of New York · No. 1:25-cv-00287
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Jan. 13, 2025

Background

Devin Richardson, who the opinion says is incarcerated at MDC Brooklyn, brought this action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying filing fees, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Filing-fee requirements

The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit the documents required to request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If that permission is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and to provide the court with certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted this fee waiver.

Order

The court ordered Richardson, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 25-CV-0287 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order on January 13, 2025. The opinion also warned that certain dismissals of prisoner cases can count as strikes under the federal prisoner-litigation statute, and that three strikes generally prevent a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.