Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 14, 2025

S. v. County of Santa Clara

Judge
Beth Freeman
Docket
5:23-cv-01532
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureCivil RightsFee Petition
In one sentence

In Amilia S. v. County of Santa Clara, Judge Freeman approved a $50,000 settlement for minor plaintiff Amilia S. and its distribution.

Who this affects

Amilia S., a minor plaintiff; Rebecca Weisman, her court-appointed guardian ad litem; the County of Santa Clara; and Amilia’s counsel, whose fees and costs were approved.

What happened

Amilia S. v. County of Santa Clara involved claims that Amilia S., a minor, brought against the County of Santa Clara concerning her treatment at the County’s acute psychiatric facility, Barbara Arons Pavilion. The parties agreed to settle all claims for $50,000.

Amilia’s court-appointed guardian ad litem asked the court to approve the settlement on her behalf. The proposed distribution provided $15,000 to Amilia, $5,610 to the guardian ad litem, $471.87 for costs, and $28,918.13 for attorney’s fees.

Judge Beth Labson Freeman granted the petition, approved the settlement and the proposed fees and costs, and ordered that Amilia’s funds be held in trust and used only for her benefit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
S. v. County of Santa Clara · No. 5:23-cv-01532
Judge
Beth Freeman
Date
Jan. 14, 2025

Background

Amilia S., a minor, brought federal civil-rights and state-law claims against the County of Santa Clara arising from her treatment at the County’s acute psychiatric facility, Barbara Arons Pavilion. The County agreed to settle all of Amilia’s claims for $50,000. Rebecca Weisman, Amilia’s court-appointed guardian ad litem, petitioned for approval of the settlement. The County did not oppose the petition.

Court’s Review

The court explained that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c) requires district courts to protect the interests of minor litigants. For a proposed settlement involving a minor, the court must independently determine whether the settlement serves the minor’s best interests. The court determined that the proposed distribution was fair and reasonable to Amilia.

The petition proposed distributing the $50,000 as follows:

- $15,000 to Amilia S.; - $5,610 to Rebecca Weisman, the guardian ad litem; - $471.87 to the Law Office of Sanjay S. Schmidt for costs; and - $28,918.13 to the Law Office of Sanjay S. Schmidt for attorney’s fees.

Ruling

The court granted the Petition for Order Approving Compromise of Claims. It approved the settlement of Amilia’s claims against the County under the parties’ settlement terms and approved the distribution of attorney’s fees and costs described in the petition.

The court also ordered that the settlement proceeds be deposited into Amilia’s client trust account within two business days after the Public Guardian received the settlement check. The account is to be managed by Amilia’s conservator at the Office of the Public Guardian, held in trust for Amilia, and used strictly for her benefit. Amilia’s counsel must notify the court when the deposits are complete.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.