Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 15, 2025

Surfside Solutions Inc. v. Helix House LLC

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:24-cv-06305
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Surfside Solutions v. Helix House, Judge Ho postponed the default-judgment conference indefinitely and ordered a joint status letter.

Who this affects

Surfside Solutions Inc., Helix House LLC, and their attorneys; the scheduled default-judgment conference was postponed indefinitely, and counsel must submit a joint status letter by January 24, 2025.

What happened

Surfside Solutions Inc. asked for a default judgment against Helix House LLC. The court had directed Helix House to oppose the request by January 14, 2025; its lawyer appeared and the company filed a declaration that day.

The court postponed the default-judgment conference scheduled for January 15 indefinitely, without setting a new date. It also ordered the parties’ lawyers to file a joint status letter by January 24 describing whether the settlement efforts mentioned in Helix House’s declaration had succeeded and, if not, proposing what should happen next.

Judge Ho also reminded Helix House that a company must appear in federal court through a licensed lawyer and that future filings must be submitted and signed by its attorney.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Surfside Solutions Inc. v. Helix House LLC · No. 1:24-cv-06305
Judge
Ho
Date
Jan. 15, 2025

Background

Surfside Solutions Inc. filed a motion for default judgment against Helix House LLC on January 7, 2025. The court directed Helix House to file an opposition by January 14. On that date, Helix House’s counsel appeared, and Helix House filed a declaration opposing the motion. The declaration described settlement efforts.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that the default-judgment conference set for January 15 was adjourned indefinitely, meaning the opinion did not set a new conference date. The court also ordered the parties’ attorneys to submit a joint status letter by January 24. The letter must state whether the settlement efforts described in Helix House’s declaration had been completed and, if not, propose the next steps in the case.

Corporate Representation Reminder

The court reminded Helix House that a corporate entity may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel. It directed that Helix House’s future filings be submitted and signed by its attorney.

Disposition and Significance

This order did not decide Surfside Solutions’ motion for default judgment. It postponed the scheduled conference and required a status update concerning settlement and the future course of the litigation.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.