Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 17, 2025

210 Muni LLC v. Mahlum

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-00435
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In 210 Muni LLC v. Mahlum, Judge Rochon ordered Defendant Mahlum to provide more citizenship details or face remand to state court.

Who this affects

Defendant Anne Mahlum must provide detailed citizenship information for the members of 210 Muni LLC and Olympic Funding LLC or the case will be remanded to New York state court. The plaintiffs’ counsel must also file a notice of appearance after being served with the order.

What happened

210 Muni LLC and Olympic Funding LLC sued Anne Mahlum in New York state court, and Mahlum removed the case to federal court based on alleged diversity of citizenship.

The court explained that a limited liability company is a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A removal notice therefore must identify the citizenship of each person or entity that owns an interest in the plaintiff LLCs, including corporate members’ states of incorporation and principal places of business.

The court ordered Defendant Mahlum to amend her removal notice by January 24, 2025. Judge Rochon stated that if she could not truthfully establish complete diversity, the case would be remanded to the New York Supreme Court without further notice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
210 Muni LLC v. Mahlum · No. 1:25-cv-00435
Judge
Rochon
Date
Jan. 17, 2025

Background

The action was removed from the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, on January 15, 2025. Defendant Anne Mahlum claimed that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. She alleged that she was a resident and citizen of Florida and stated, based on information and belief, that no members of 210 Muni LLC or Olympic Funding LLC were Florida citizens.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that a limited liability company is considered a citizen of every state in which its members are citizens. A notice of removal relying on diversity jurisdiction must therefore identify the citizenship of each person or entity that makes up the plaintiff LLCs. If a corporate entity is an LLC member, the notice must state that entity’s state of incorporation and principal place of business. The court held that simply alleging that an LLC is a citizen of a different state from the opposing party is conclusory and does not establish the required diversity of citizenship.

Order

The court ordered Defendant Mahlum to amend her Notice of Removal by January 24, 2025, to allege the citizenship of each constituent person or entity comprising the plaintiff LLCs. The court further ordered that, if she could not truthfully allege complete diversity by that date, the action would be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, without further notice. The court also directed Defendant Mahlum to serve the order on the plaintiffs within two business days and file proof of service, and directed the plaintiffs’ counsel to file a notice of appearance within two business days after service. The order was signed as “ENNIPER L. ROCHON,” while the opinion’s opening identifies the judge as “JENNIFER L. ROCHON.”

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.