Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 24, 2025

Alissa T. v. Colvin

Judge
Paul Magnuson
Docket
0:23-cv-00343
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Alissa T. v. King, Judge Magnuson granted counsel’s fee request, ordered direct payment, and required a refund of earlier fees.

Who this affects

Alissa T., Plaintiff’s counsel, and the Acting Commissioner of Social Security are affected: counsel receives $10,111.41, Defendant must pay it directly, and counsel must refund $6,780.43 to Alissa T.

What happened

In Alissa T. v. Michelle A. King, Plaintiff’s counsel asked for attorney’s fees under a federal Social Security law. The government did not oppose or support the request.

Alissa T. was entitled to $40,445.66 in past-due benefits, and counsel requested $10,111.41—25 percent of that amount. Counsel also had previously received a $6,780.43 fee award under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

Judge Paul A. Magnuson granted the motion, ordered the Defendant to pay $10,111.41 directly to counsel, and required counsel to refund the $6,780.43 previously awarded to Alissa T.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Alissa T. v. Colvin · No. 0:23-cv-00343
Judge
Paul Magnuson
Date
Jan. 24, 2025

Background

The Court considered Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The government did not oppose or support the requested award. It asked the Court not to include language directing the Commissioner to pay the award, but did not explain who would pay it instead.

The statute permits an award of up to 25 percent of a claimant’s past-due benefits and requires the Court to determine whether the requested fee is reasonable. Alissa T. was entitled to $40,445.66 in past-due benefits. Counsel requested $10,111.41, which equals 25 percent of those benefits.

Court’s analysis

The Court found no basis to reduce the requested fee. Counsel did not cause delay or provide substandard representation. Counsel submitted records of the hours worked, and the requested amount produced an effective hourly rate of approximately $800, which the Court said was within the range approved in other disability cases in the District of Minnesota. The Court therefore found that a fee equal to 25 percent of Alissa T.’s award was reasonable.

Counsel also reported receiving a previous $6,780.43 attorney’s-fee award under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Court noted that refunding previously paid fees to the claimant is the preferred method for addressing that earlier award.

Disposition

Judge Paul A. Magnuson ordered that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was GRANTED. The order awarded $10,111.41 in attorney’s fees, directed Defendant to pay that amount directly to Plaintiff’s counsel under the agreement Alissa T. signed, and required counsel to refund $6,780.43 to Alissa T.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.