Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 21, 2025

Buxbaum v. Kevin Conway, Esq.

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:25-cv-00519
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Conway, Judge Swain required payment or an IFP application before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum, whose case could not proceed unless he paid the required fees or submitted an application to proceed without prepayment of fees.

What happened

Michael Buxbaum submitted this civil action against Kevin Conway, Esq., by email, and the court assigned it docket number 25-CV-0519 (LTS). The court said a plaintiff must pay the required fees or ask to proceed without paying them in advance.

The court ordered Buxbaum, within 30 days, to either pay $405 or submit a completed and signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. Until one of those steps occurred, the court would take no further action, issue no summons, and require no answer.

The order, signed by Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain, said the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling if Buxbaum did not comply or request more time. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, stating that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Kevin Conway, Esq. · No. 7:25-cv-00519
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Jan. 21, 2025

Background

Michael Buxbaum submitted this action to the Southern District of New York by email. The opinion does not address the underlying claims against Kevin Conway, Esq. It states that beginning a civil action requires either payment of the required fees or a request to proceed without prepaying them.

Order

The court ordered Buxbaum to act within 30 days from the date of the order. He had to either pay $405 in fees or submit a completed and signed application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The order explains that the $405 consisted of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee, subject to possible updates in the fee schedule.

Until the fees were paid or a completed and signed application was received, the court said that no further action would be taken, no summons would issue, and no answer would be required. If Buxbaum complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case. If the court granted the application, Buxbaum would be allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

Disposition

The court ordered that the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling if Buxbaum failed to comply within the allowed time or failed to request an extension. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the merits of Buxbaum’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.