Alexander v. City of New York
- Subramanian
- 1:24-cv-08084
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Alexander v. City of New York, Judge Subramanian ordered city lawyers to identify a correction officer for Alexander’s lawsuit.
Zion Alexander, the New York City Department of Correction, the New York City Law Department, and the defendant described in the complaint as correction officer Kowonda.
What happened
In Alexander v. City of New York, Zion Alexander, who is incarcerated, sued the City of New York and others under a federal civil-rights law, representing himself. The court added several people and an organization as defendants based on allegations in his complaint.
A waiver of service for correction officer Kowonda could not be completed because the Department of Correction found no employee matching that name. The court said the complaint provided enough information for the Department to identify the officer Alexander described.
The court ordered the New York City Law Department to find Kowonda’s identity and provide it to Alexander and the court within 30 days. Judge Arun Subramanian also directed the Clerk of Court to notify the Department of Correction and the Law Department.
The detailed version
- Alexander v. City of New York · No. 1:24-cv-08084
- Subramanian
- Jan. 24, 2025
Background
Zion Alexander, who is incarcerated at George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island, brought this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against state or local officials for violating federal rights. He originally sued the City of New York and Rhodina Lynn Williams, M.D. The court construed his complaint as also asserting claims against correction officers Reynolds and Kowonda and Physician Affiliate Group of New York, P.C., which appeared to be Williams’s employer.
The City and correction officer Reynolds returned executed waivers of service. Kowonda’s waiver was returned unexecuted because no employee matching that name was employed by the agency. The court referred to the rule that a person representing himself in court is entitled to the court’s help identifying a defendant when the complaint provides enough information to do so.
Order
The court found that Alexander’s complaint supplied sufficient information for the New York City Department of Correction to identify the officer Alexander described as Kowonda. It ordered the New York City Law Department, identified as the attorney for and agent of the Department of Correction, to ascertain Kowonda’s identity and provide that information to Alexander and the court within 30 days of the order. Judge Arun Subramanian directed the Clerk of Court to notify the Department of Correction and the Law Department. The order did not decide the merits of Alexander’s civil-rights claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.