Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 17, 2025

Tejada v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-10068
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tejada v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Swain closed a duplicate Social Security case after its claims were refiled in an earlier action.

Who this affects

Reberto Tejada and the claims he sought to pursue in this docket; the case was closed so those claims could proceed in Tejada I if that earlier case were reopened.

What happened

Tejada v. Commissioner of Social Security concerned a complaint seeking, among other things, review of Social Security Administration decisions. The court determined that the complaint appeared to continue claims from an earlier case, Tejada I.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to close this case because the complaint had been refiled in Tejada I. The court stated that the claims could proceed in Tejada I if that earlier case were reopened, and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on January 17, 2025. The order closed this docket without prejudice to the claims proceeding in Tejada I upon reopening of that case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tejada v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:24-cv-10068
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 17, 2025

Background

Reberto Tejada brought this action seeking, among other things, review of Social Security Administration decisions concerning his entitlement to disability insurance benefits. The opinion states that Tejada had raised related claims in an earlier action, identified as Tejada I, No. 24-CV-04852 (BCM). In that earlier case, the parties consented to a magistrate judge’s jurisdiction, and the Social Security Administration moved to dismiss the complaint or for summary judgment. The earlier case was later dismissed without prejudice after Tejada filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, although he continued filing motions there.

Tejada filed this action on December 26, 2024. The court determined that the new complaint appeared to seek continuation of claims raised in Tejada I. The complaint was therefore refiled in Tejada I.

Ruling

The court directed the Clerk of Court to close this action under docket number 24-CV-10068 (LTS). It stated that the claims could proceed in Tejada I upon reopening of that closed case. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.