Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 28, 2025

Riley v. Old Northern Boulevard Restaurant, LLC

Judge
Tarnofsky
Docket
1:25-cv-00577
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Riley v. Old Northern Boulevard Restaurant, LLC, Judge Tarnofsky ordered the parties to discuss settlement and standing and report whether to mediate or proceed.

Who this affects

Amanie Riley and Old Northern Boulevard Restaurant, LLC, the parties required to meet, discuss settlement and standing, and submit a joint letter to the court.

What happened

Riley v. Old Northern Boulevard Restaurant, LLC concerns Amanie Riley’s lawsuit against Old Northern Boulevard Restaurant, LLC. The order does not describe the underlying claims or decide whether Riley has standing to sue.

Judge Tarnofsky ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served. They must make a good-faith effort to settle and discuss whether Riley has satisfied the requirement of standing, which concerns whether she is legally entitled to bring the case. They must also consider whether court-connected mediation or a settlement conference would help.

Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky ordered the parties to submit a joint letter within 45 days after service stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must ask the court to refer the case to mediation, schedule a settlement conference, or hold an initial case-management conference.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Riley v. Old Northern Boulevard Restaurant, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-00577
Judge
Tarnofsky
Date
Jan. 28, 2025

Order

The court issued a case-management and settlement order in Amanie Riley’s action against Old Northern Boulevard Restaurant, LLC. The caption states that Riley brings the action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the claims or decide their merits.

Settlement Meeting and Standing

The court ordered the parties, within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint, to meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith effort to settle the action. During those discussions, the parties must consider whether Riley has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. Standing is the legal requirement that a plaintiff be entitled to bring the particular dispute before the court. The parties must also discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before Judge Tarnofsky would be productive if they cannot settle themselves.

Joint Letter and Next Step

Within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint, the parties must submit a joint letter telling the court whether they have settled. If they have not settled, the letter must request one of three options: referral to mediation, a date for a settlement conference, or an initial case-management conference.

Disposition

The court entered these procedural requirements but did not rule on standing, the underlying claims, or the merits of the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.