Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 28, 2025

Buxbaum v. Hellman

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-00601
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Hellman, Judge Swain ordered Michael Buxbaum to pay $405 or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum must either pay $405 or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days, or request an extension. If he does not comply, the action will be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. Howard Hellman is not required to answer at this stage.

What happened

Buxbaum v. Hellman began when Michael Buxbaum submitted this civil action to the court by email. The opinion does not describe the claims against Howard Hellman.

The court ordered Buxbaum to either pay $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without paying those fees upfront. The court said it would take no further action, issue no summons, and require no answer until one of those steps was completed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain gave Buxbaum 30 days to comply or request more time. If he did not, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Hellman · No. 1:25-cv-00601
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 28, 2025

Background

Michael Buxbaum submitted this civil action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by email. The opinion identifies Howard Hellman as the defendant but does not describe the claims or underlying dispute.

Order

The court explained that a plaintiff must either pay the required fees for a civil action or request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The total fee identified in the order was $405, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee.

Within 30 days of the order, Buxbaum was required to either pay the $405 or complete, sign, and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application. The court stated that it would take no further action, issue no summons, and require no answer until it received payment or a completed and signed application. If Buxbaum submitted an application, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if the court granted the application, he could proceed without paying the fees upfront.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Buxbaum to comply within the allowed period or seek an extension. If he failed to comply or failed to request more time, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

Classification

This is a procedural order. It addresses payment of filing fees or submission of an IFP application and does not decide the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.