Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 27, 2025

Perelman v. Visa USA, Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:24-cv-09793
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Perelman v. Visa USA, Judge Rearden ordered the Marshals Service to serve Visa after allowing Perelman to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Mark A. Perelman and Visa USA, Inc.; the order directs the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service to arrange service of the lawsuit.

What happened

In Perelman v. Visa USA, Inc., Mark A. Perelman, representing himself, alleges that Visa USA, Inc. discriminated against him based on several protected characteristics under federal, state, and city laws. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Because Perelman was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and prepare the paperwork needed for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Visa. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and said Perelman should request more time if service is not completed by then.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service form, send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service, and mail Perelman an information package. Perelman must also notify the court in writing if his address changes.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perelman v. Visa USA, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-09793
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Jan. 27, 2025

Background

Mark A. Perelman, proceeding without a lawyer, sued Visa USA, Inc. under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws. He alleges employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, age, and disability.

The court previously granted Perelman's request to proceed without prepaying court fees. When a plaintiff receives that permission, federal law requires the court to arrange service of process through the U.S. Marshals Service rather than requiring the plaintiff to pay for service himself.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Visa USA, Inc., issue a summons, and deliver the documents needed for the Marshals Service to serve Visa. The opinion lists Visa's service address as 900 Metro Center Blvd., Foster City, California 94404.

The court explained that the usual 90-day service period runs from the date the complaint is filed, but a plaintiff proceeding without prepaying fees cannot complete service until the court reviews the complaint and orders a summons issued. The court therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed by then, Perelman should request an extension of time.

The court also directed the Clerk to mail Perelman an information package. Perelman must notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Disposition and Scope

This order concerns service of the lawsuit and does not decide the merits of Perelman's discrimination allegations. Judge Jennifer H. Rearden signed the order on January 27, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.