Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 3, 2025

Murray v. The State of New York

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:24-cv-08015
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Michaeljohn Murray v. The State of New York, Judge Woods dismissed the action without leave to amend, denied appeal fee-free status, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Michaeljohn Murray’s action was dismissed without leave to amend. The State of New York, the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, and the New York City Housing Authority received judgment, and the case was closed.

What happened

Michaeljohn Murray sued The State of New York and other defendants in the Southern District of New York. The judgment identifies the Graduate Center of the City University of New York and the New York City Housing Authority as defendants receiving judgment.

The court dismissed the action without allowing Murray to amend it. It also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal. The judgment states that the reasons were given in a February 2, 2025 order, which is not included here.

Judge Gregory Woods’s court entered judgment for the State of New York, the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, and the New York City Housing Authority, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Murray v. The State of New York · No. 1:24-cv-08015
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Feb. 3, 2025

Disposition

The court dismissed the action without leave to amend. “Without leave to amend” means the judgment did not allow the plaintiff to file an amended pleading in this action.

The judgment entered for the State of New York, the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, and the New York City Housing Authority. The court stated that the reasons for dismissal were provided in its February 2, 2025 order; that order is not included in the supplied text, so the underlying grounds for dismissal cannot be determined from this judgment alone.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying court fees for purposes of an appeal. The case was closed.

Judge

Judge Gregory Woods is identified as the judge for this case. The judgment itself was dated February 3, 2025 and was entered by the court clerk’s office.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.